Добавлено: Вс Янв 10, 2016 7:46
Заголовок сообщения: Is the Necromancer a worse necromancer than the Archmage
Isn't it a bit weird that the Archmage has better necromantic potentials than the Necromancer? I understand the game's mechanics and all the dual-class thingies...but you know what I mean?
P. S. What's this Druid? I don't remember it in the previous versions of the game and don't see the latest patch added him.
If you are talking about New Horizons, necromancer is certainly a better necromancer then archmage. Arch has 7 levels from the necromancy skill and 5 from the summoning skill (affects undead with half of the power). Master necromancer has 4+3 from skills and 10 from the class bonus. Then there are reduced cost on undead binding and upkeep, double commander bonuses for undead etc etc.
Druid was introduced in the NH at the same time necromancer became the mage-commander class (was the mage-ranger in vanilla). That was in early 2013 I guess. _________________ Phenomenal self as such is not an epistemically justified form of mental content.
If you are talking about New Horizons, necromancer is certainly a better necromancer then archmage. Arch has 7 levels from the necromancy skill and 5 from the summoning skill (affects undead with half of the power). Master necromancer has 4+3 from skills and 10 from the class bonus. Then there are reduced cost on undead binding and upkeep, double commander bonuses for undead etc etc.
Druid was introduced in the NH at the same time necromancer became the mage-commander class (was the mage-ranger in vanilla). That was in early 2013 I guess.
Must've accidentally played the original and thus mixed it up...
Ты не можешь начинать темы Ты не можешь отвечать на сообщения Ты не можешь редактировать свои сообщения Ты не можешь удалять свои сообщения Ты не можешь голосовать в опросах